ten10 Projects
To achieve perfect aim, just shoot then call anything you hit as target.
Sunday, July 4, 2010

Lucky Watch Winder

Many “cheap” or “affordable” watch winders that are found in the market today are made in China. There’s no doubt about that. Some have performed well and others just fall out after a short period of usage. When I say “perform well”, I mean for duration of a year or so. Why? Because most motors generally have a life-span of about 13 months depending on the number of cycles and the load it carries (axial torque).


It’s really difficult to tell if one brand works better from the other too because within a brand, different batches of motors have different quality standards. So, if you’re lucky, you’ll get a winder unit with a motor lasting a year, if not too bad. But it seems many consumers are happy (or it seems) paying for what they get. Cheaper winders become a disposable device much like printers nowadays.

This was what I experienced after sampling a batch of winders yesterday…


Batch #1
4 units out of 20 were peeling  - Fail

1 out of 20 has loose parts - Pass

6 out of 20 units have lower RPMs than specified - Fail

5 out of 20 units have motors that were noisy and stagger when they move - Fail



Batch #2
3 out of 20 units were scratched - Pass

2 units from the 20 have missing screws - Pass

16 out of 20 units have different RPMs than specified - Fail

10 unit our of the 20 were making grinding sounds when rotating - Fail

1 out of 20 units didn’t power-up - Pass


I’m using a very loose sampling plan from Mil-Std-105E to see the AQL (Acceptance Quality Level). I know it’s not a military product but just the determine if there’s a quality level benchmark somewhere I have to take some sort of standard.

Looking at the statistics, you’ll find that the second batch has a sudden jump in the number of non-spec RPM and noisy motors. The fault lies with the buyer that they didn’t clearly specify what their requirements are and their acceptance quality level. The buyer had only negotiated for the returns of “dead” units and badly scratched units. When I asked for limit samples, the buyer was stunned. There must be a limit sample to show the seller what is the range of “slightly scratched” to “badly scratched” units. This is prevent further arguments during returns. Now they are in a fix because from my experience, the chinese sellers will argue their way out.

With regards to the noisy motors, it’s the same. What are the lowest acceptable noise and the highest? Make 3 sets of such samples – 1 set for the manufacturer/seller, 1 for Marketing and 1 for in-coming inspections.

From the consumer’s point-of-view, they expect every unit to be working, provide the purpose of winding their watches and last for at least a few years. But they wouldn’t know the difficulties the distributor has at the background on what units they received.


If my guess is correct, this company will still sell all the units, minus the ones we detected at the price to make profits. The ones that were rejected were either repaired, salvaged for replacement parts or returned. But I doubt the latter because shipping back to the manufacturer would cost them a bomb.

Hmmm, how are they going to make right the motors with non-spec RPMs?

But anyway, buying a cheap and good watch winder is like winning a lottery. So good luck!

Labels:


posted at 4:02 AM by ten10


My Profile

Archives

Sep 28, 2009
Sep 30, 2009
Oct 4, 2009
Oct 7, 2009
Oct 11, 2009
Oct 14, 2009
Oct 17, 2009
Oct 18, 2009
Oct 20, 2009
Oct 23, 2009
Oct 26, 2009
Oct 29, 2009
Nov 2, 2009
Nov 6, 2009
Nov 10, 2009
Nov 13, 2009
Nov 16, 2009
Nov 20, 2009
Nov 23, 2009
Nov 27, 2009
Dec 1, 2009
Dec 4, 2009
Dec 7, 2009
Dec 10, 2009
Dec 18, 2009
Dec 24, 2009
Jan 3, 2010
Jan 8, 2010
Jan 12, 2010
Jan 16, 2010
Jan 20, 2010
Jan 22, 2010
Jan 27, 2010
Feb 1, 2010
Feb 5, 2010
Feb 18, 2010
Feb 24, 2010
May 3, 2010
May 8, 2010
May 12, 2010
May 17, 2010
May 31, 2010
Jun 5, 2010
Jun 9, 2010
Jun 13, 2010
Jun 18, 2010
Jun 22, 2010
Jun 27, 2010
Jul 4, 2010
Jul 9, 2010
Jul 29, 2010
Aug 8, 2010
Aug 12, 2010
Aug 19, 2010
Aug 31, 2010
Sep 4, 2010
Sep 9, 2010
Sep 22, 2010
Sep 25, 2010
Sep 28, 2010
Oct 1, 2010
Oct 9, 2010
Oct 14, 2010
Oct 15, 2010
Nov 5, 2010
Nov 14, 2010
Nov 19, 2010
Nov 28, 2010
Nov 30, 2010
Jan 17, 2011


home

Recent Entries

Watch Winders Made-In-Singapore
Lubricants will coagulate in my Watch – Truth or Myth
Noise Levels in Watch Winders
Watch Winder Personalization
Let’s get Clock Wise – Interesting Facts
AC Watch Winder Controller Board
Watch-strap Valets
Wind One Watch, Stress-test the Other
Giving your broken Watch Winder a New Life
The Aesthetics of a Watch Winder


Sites I Visit

All About Circuits
Chad the Watch Guy
Chronocentric
Circuits Today
Complaints Board
Dardel Paris
DIY Electronic Projects
Electronic Circuits Projects
Electronic Zone
Electronics Projects
Fratellowatches
Horology Zone
Horozima
MetkuMods
Paneristi
Perpetuelle
Public Warehouse
RED Free Circuits
Talking Electronics
World of Time
Carbon Watch Winder


Watch Winders

Abest
Arcera
Brown Safe
Buben & Zorweg
Cradle of Time
Dottling
Eilux
Elma Motion
ERS/Bocano
Erwin Sattler
MTE
Orbita
Penelop
Rapport
Roytec, China
Scatola DelTempo
Swiss Kubik
UB Sammerl
Underwood
Wolf Designs


Credits

design by maystar
powered by blogger